9BabyNames Baby names with meanings & US popularity data Italiano

Homer vs Noah

How Homer and Noah compare across 146 years of US Social Security Administration baby-name records — popularity history, peak years, current rank, and which name overtook which.

Open Name Tournament

Homer

Male · Greek

Meaning: Security

Noah

Male · Hebrew

Meaning: Comfort

US Popularity History — Side-by-Side

Annual US births named Homer (boys) vs Noah (boys), from US Social Security Administration national records.

Source: US Social Security Administration. Names appearing fewer than 5 times per year are suppressed by SSA.

Quick Stats

Metric Homer Noah
Peak year (most US births) 1920 — 1,722 boys 2025 — 20,358 boys
Peak rank #100 #2
Most recent rank (1920) #100 (1,722 births) #2 (20,358 births)
Total US births since 1880 15,201 491,353
Last 10 years (1911–1920) 7,089 191,165

Peak comparison takeaway

At its all-time peak, Noah reached 20,358 US births in 2025 — 18,636 more than Homer's peak count.

Crossover Years

Years where one name first passed the other in annual US births. A name "winning" in a year means it had more births that year, not necessarily a higher rank.

Year New leader Homer births Noah births
1995 Noah 0 3,824

Strongest States — Last 10 Years

States where each name ranked highest, from SSA's state-level dataset. Lower average rank = name appears closer to the top of that state's boys-name list.

Homer — top 5 states

#StateAvg rankBirths
1 Georgia #90 293
2 West Virginia #93 285
3 Kentucky #99 219

Noah — top 5 states

#StateAvg rankBirths
1 Illinois #1 6,477
2 California #1 23,503
3 Connecticut #1 2,147
4 Pennsylvania #1 6,292
5 Michigan #1 4,404

Want a different comparison?

Data & methodology

Source: US Social Security Administration national baby names dataset 1880–2025 (CC0 public domain). Names with fewer than 5 occurrences in a given year are suppressed by SSA. State-level coverage runs 1910–2025. Crossover detection compares annual birth counts (not ranks) for each year both names appear. Methodology: see full notes. More comparisons →