Selected Name Histories: Checking Pop-Culture Claims
Inspect observed counts for selected names before attributing a change to entertainment or a public figure. A national name series records usage, not a family’s motivation.
By Marvin Tang · Content and calculations reviewed October 27, 2026.
National data scope: 65,411 imported name/sex/year records across 1880–2025. This is a selected subset of SSA records, with narrower historical coverage and catalog/rank filters. A missing row does not establish zero use or fewer than five uses. Figures below describe the stated selection. Data coverage and limits.
Observed counts at selected years
The names below are retained as a selection from this report’s earlier examples. Both sex-specific series are checked. These are observation points, not documented event dates or claims that a name began with a work of fiction. Names without a matching imported row remain in the table so the coverage gap is visible.
| Name | SSA sex list | 2000 | 2010 | 2020 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arya | F | Not covered in this import | 273 | 2,372 | 1,858 |
| Arya | M | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Bella | F | 307 | 5,135 | 3,645 | 2,129 |
| Bella | M | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Edward | F | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Edward | M | 3,485 | 2,905 | 1,950 | 1,591 |
| Aaliyah | F | 1,496 | 4,672 | 3,578 | 2,607 |
| Aaliyah | M | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Diana | F | 3,166 | 1,622 | 1,236 | 1,277 |
| Diana | M | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Elsa | F | 240 | 487 | 284 | Not covered in this import |
| Elsa | M | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Khaleesi | F | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Khaleesi | M | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Renesmee | F | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
| Renesmee | M | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import | Not covered in this import |
What would support a cultural explanation?
First establish the date and identity of the cultural reference from a reliable source. Then inspect a consistently covered annual naming series before and after that date, rather than two isolated points. Consider pre-existing usage, alternative spellings, and other changes happening at the same time.
Even a clear increase after an event establishes a temporal association, not how many parents named a child because of that event. Interviews, surveys, or other direct evidence would be needed for stronger claims about motivation. The annual count tables alone cannot provide that evidence.
First observed is not first ever used
A name’s first row in this site’s history may be the first time it met an import cutoff. The official public data also have privacy limits. Neither absence establishes that the name did not exist, was unused, or was invented in that year. When coverage changes, growth multipliers require particular care: an absent baseline cannot be changed to zero or one.
Sources and interpretation
Popularity counts come from the US Social Security Administration baby-name files. SSA records applications for Social Security cards and separates exact spellings and recorded sex. Its public files apply privacy limits; this site applies additional import limits. National counts do not identify families, religion, ethnicity, gender identity, or the reason a name was chosen. Name origins are separate editorial fields, not SSA findings.
Read the full methodology · Understand a missing record · Browse reports