9BabyNames Baby names with meanings & US popularity data Italiano

Jazlynn vs Abigail

How Jazlynn and Abigail compare across 146 years of US Social Security Administration baby-name records — popularity history, peak years, current rank, and which name overtook which.

Open Name Tournament

Jazlynn

Female · English

Meaning: Modern Variant Of Jasmine: Combination Of Jocelyn And The Musical Term Jazz.

Abigail

Female · Hebrew

Meaning: "Father Rejoices."Some Variants Include Abagail, Abaigeal, Abbey, Abbie, And Abby. Diminutive, Gail, Also Exists.

US Popularity History — Side-by-Side

Annual US births named Jazlynn (girls) vs Abigail (girls), from US Social Security Administration national records.

Source: US Social Security Administration. Names appearing fewer than 5 times per year are suppressed by SSA.

Quick Stats

Metric Jazlynn Abigail
Peak year (most US births) 2011 — 510 girls 2003 — 15,932 girls
Peak rank #572 #6
Most recent rank (2018) #918 (292 births) #41 (4,941 births)
Total US births since 1880 4,724 383,135
Last 10 years (2009–2018) 3,976 78,822

Peak comparison takeaway

At its all-time peak, Abigail reached 15,932 US births in 2003 — 15,422 more than Jazlynn's peak count.

Strongest States — Last 10 Years

States where each name ranked highest, from SSA's state-level dataset. Lower average rank = name appears closer to the top of that state's girls-name list.

Jazlynn — top 5 states

#StateAvg rankBirths
1 Nevada #538 22
2 Texas #599 498
3 Oklahoma #637 33
4 Kentucky #651 39
5 Arizona #683 88

Abigail — top 5 states

#StateAvg rankBirths
1 Virginia #12 2,260
2 Idaho #12 498
3 Maryland #14 1,391
4 Alaska #15 204
5 Oregon #15 907

Want a different comparison?

Data & methodology

Source: US Social Security Administration national baby names dataset 1880–2025 (CC0 public domain). Names with fewer than 5 occurrences in a given year are suppressed by SSA. State-level coverage runs 1910–2025. Crossover detection compares annual birth counts (not ranks) for each year both names appear. Methodology: see full notes. More comparisons →