Muhammad vs Mason
How Muhammad and Mason compare across 146 years of US Social Security Administration baby-name records — popularity history, peak years, current rank, and which name overtook which.
Muhammad
Male · Arabic
Meaning: Variant Used For Mohammad - Founder Of Islamic Religion. Praiseworthy: Glorified.
US Popularity History — Side-by-Side
Annual US births named Muhammad (boys) vs Mason (boys), from US Social Security Administration national records.
Source: US Social Security Administration. Names appearing fewer than 5 times per year are suppressed by SSA.
Quick Stats
| Metric | Muhammad | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Peak year (most US births) | 2025 — 1,473 boys | 2011 — 19,528 boys |
| Peak rank | #239 | #2 |
| Most recent rank (2025) | #239 (1,473 births) | #39 (6,291 births) |
| Total US births since 1880 | 18,614 | 310,019 |
| Last 10 years (2016–2025) | 11,270 | 100,150 |
Peak comparison takeaway
At its all-time peak, Mason reached 19,528 US births in 2011 — 18,055 more than Muhammad's peak count.
Strongest States — Last 10 Years
States where each name ranked highest, from SSA's state-level dataset. Lower average rank = name appears closer to the top of that state's boys-name list.
Muhammad — top 5 states
| # | State | Avg rank | Births |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York | #69 | 2,520 |
| 2 | Maryland | #147 | 412 |
| 3 | New Jersey | #170 | 531 |
| 4 | Virginia | #173 | 504 |
| 5 | Delaware | #176 | 20 |
Mason — top 5 states
| # | State | Avg rank | Births |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mississippi | #8 | 1,093 |
| 2 | West Virginia | #9 | 732 |
| 3 | Pennsylvania | #11 | 4,279 |
| 4 | North Carolina | #11 | 3,574 |
| 5 | Hawaii | #12 | 359 |
Want a different comparison?
Data & methodology
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby names dataset 1880–2025 (CC0 public domain). Names with fewer than 5 occurrences in a given year are suppressed by SSA. State-level coverage runs 1910–2025. Crossover detection compares annual birth counts (not ranks) for each year both names appear. Methodology: see full notes. More comparisons →