9BabyNames Baby names with meanings & US popularity data Italiano

Judy vs Mia

How Judy and Mia compare across 146 years of US Social Security Administration baby-name records — popularity history, peak years, current rank, and which name overtook which.

Open Name Tournament

Judy

Female · Hebrew

Meaning: Praised From Judea.

Mia

Female · Latin

Meaning: Mine

US Popularity History — Side-by-Side

Annual US births named Judy (girls) vs Mia (girls), from US Social Security Administration national records.

Source: US Social Security Administration. Names appearing fewer than 5 times per year are suppressed by SSA.

Quick Stats

Metric Judy Mia
Peak year (most US births) 1947 — 21,036 girls 2015 — 14,939 girls
Peak rank #14 #6
Most recent rank (1966) #97 (3,510 births) #6 (11,078 births)
Total US births since 1880 344,847 280,686
Last 10 years (1957–1966) 74,519 121,307

Peak comparison takeaway

At its all-time peak, Judy reached 21,036 US births in 1947 — 6,097 more than Mia's peak count.

Crossover Years

Years where one name first passed the other in annual US births. A name "winning" in a year means it had more births that year, not necessarily a higher rank.

Year New leader Judy births Mia births
2000 Mia 0 3,451

Strongest States — Last 10 Years

States where each name ranked highest, from SSA's state-level dataset. Lower average rank = name appears closer to the top of that state's girls-name list.

Judy — top 5 states

#StateAvg rankBirths
1 New Jersey #898 48
2 New York #927 69

Mia — top 5 states

#StateAvg rankBirths
1 New Mexico #2 775
2 California #3 19,952
3 New Jersey #3 3,970
4 Nevada #3 1,236
5 Texas #4 14,721

Want a different comparison?

Data & methodology

Source: US Social Security Administration national baby names dataset 1880–2025 (CC0 public domain). Names with fewer than 5 occurrences in a given year are suppressed by SSA. State-level coverage runs 1910–2025. Crossover detection compares annual birth counts (not ranks) for each year both names appear. Methodology: see full notes. More comparisons →